![]() ![]() Thousands of artifacts dot the fossil shoreline on the desert floor of eastern Kern County at the interface of the Mojave Desert and the Great Basin near Ridgecrest (Davis 1978). A prominent locality for Paleoindian material is Lake China. archaeobotany, macroscopic remains, flotation, phytoliths and microscoping: the study of plant remains in archeology, we can use flotation to see what kinds of plants were growing back then (seeds and nuts) phytoliths: microscopic silica bodies found in plants, looking at them with microscopes we date them back with radiocarbon dating 4.Archaeological sites within the Great Basin and California appear to demonstrate that human occupation occurred in late Pleistocene and early Holocene times from ca. Palynology: the study of pollen, studying cores, we can see how the plants changed over time 3. dendrochronology, fire-scar analysis: looking at the rings in trees to date how old the trees are, using the rings and the year that they were from with scars from fires-we can tell when burning when was done 2. Where native people's were landscape managers, collaboration with CA state parks, Amah Mutsun Tribal Band worked with them, their ancestors lived in the area and used to do anthropogenic burning- purposefully burning area to enhance biodiversity-led to lots of new species of plants (berries, nuts, seeds) which increased productivity of area, provided rich feed for economic animals like deer and rabbits -when Russians and Spanish came in, they prohibited anthropogenic burning cause they didnt want indians burning their infrastructure 1950 when CA became a state, they prohibited it -1700s- amah mutsun ancestors brought into the missions, lost a lot of knowledge about the burning, working with CA state parks so CA state parks can get more knowledge about it-they are all trying to revive it -landscape managers today interested in using anthropogenic burning, especially small ones, where areas are overgrown, to enhance biodiversity -4 major factures that went in 1. (4/22, lecture notes on Shackley reading) -based on aesthetics ![]() Analysis: methods we use to shed info on past people technological analysis of lithics: -flaked or chipped stone: use lithic cores or cobbles to strike these rocks, usually used on rocks with high silica content-obsidian (kryptocrystalline), struck with heavy blow, flakes drop, form sharp edges -ground stone: grinding and polishing to get shape, pestles and charmstones, in CA we don't have ceramic making, usually baskets can combine groundstone with soapstone to make smooth edges and produces bowls form analysis of lithics: -use-wear studies: experimental archaeology, the edges of tools can be analyzed to see what activities they've done we replicate the stone tools and do different activities with them and then look at the edges afterwards we can compare to past tools to see what the tools were used for (wood chipping, skinning, butchering, etc.) -residue analysis: if blood hasn't come off yet, we can see the proteins on the tool and see what animals they've killed or something stylistic analysis: Steve Shackley used stylistic analysis of these Obsidian and Glass artifacts to show that the design of his tools were influenced by many tribes, not just his (ishi's) own.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |